Menu
Published: August 25, 2025
In a dramatic shift for one of the world’s fastest-growing gaming markets, The India ban on real-money gaming 2025, passed under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025. The legislation cleared both houses of Parliament in late August and has been welcomed by the government as a step toward promoting esports and safer social gaming while eliminating money-based games.
The law prohibits any online game—skill-based, chance-based, or hybrid—where users pay a fee, deposit money, or place a stake in expectation of monetary or valuable returns. It also bans advertising and financial transactions that enable such services. In other words: fantasy sports, poker, rummy, betting exchanges, and similar formats are within scope.
The Act empowers the Centre to set up an Online Gaming Authority (or designate a national commission) to classify games, issue directions, and coordinate enforcement. Authorities can block access to unlawful platforms and direct payment intermediaries to halt transactions. The text of the bill makes clear the ban applies across India and to offshore operators serving Indian users.
As reported by multiple outlets and reflected in the bill’s briefings, offering money-based games after the law comes into force can attract up to three years’ imprisonment and fines, with harsher penalties for repeat offenders.
Key operators swiftly moved to comply. Mobile Premier League (MPL) suspended all money-based titles, and Dream11 halted real-money play while entering talks to exit its ₹358 crore jersey sponsorship with the BCCI, a high-visibility deal for Team India.
Officials pointed to risks around addiction, debt-related harms, financial fraud, money laundering, and even terror financing. Government communications also framed the policy as a two-track approach: encourage esports and social/educational games, while prohibiting money games.
Industry leaders and investors warn the ban could push users to offshore grey-market platforms and freeze venture funding amid regulatory uncertainty. Analysts note a likely near-term slowdown in domestic gaming investment until the new authority issues clarifications and implementation rules.
The bill’s blanket treatment of money games runs counter to prior Indian jurisprudence distinguishing games of skill from games of chance—a line that historically protected formats such as rummy and fantasy sports. Stakeholders are expected to test the law in court on grounds including Article 19(1)(g) (freedom to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business), arguing that a total prohibition on skill-based real-money formats is a disproportionate restriction.
Civil liberties groups also highlight search-and-seizure powers without warrant and broad blocking directions to platforms and payment intermediaries, warning of privacy and due-process concerns in digital spaces. Several state–centre coordination issues may emerge as enforcement touches state police powers and local cyber cells.
International experience suggests two diverging models. Prohibition-heavy regimes (e.g., China’s stringent controls) often witness the rise of black-market intermediaries, account-rental rings, and consumer harm migrating to unregulated channels. Licensing-led regimes (e.g., the United States’ state-by-state approach) typically separate skill and chance, define permitted formats, and rely on licensing, geofencing, KYC/AML, responsible-gaming tools, marketing codes, and taxation to balance consumer protection with innovation.
For India’s ecosystem, a pragmatic path—clear definitions, licensure, and strong compliance tooling—could channel demand into supervised environments, preserve jobs and tax revenue, and reduce incentives to use offshore sites.
Assess compliance risks: Operators targeting India should carefully evaluate exposure under the new Bill. Real-money formats face high legal and financial risks, while eSports, social, or educational games appear to remain permissible.
Diversification options: Some companies may pivot toward ad-based or skill-development gaming to retain user engagement without monetary stakes.
Monitor legal landscape: Constitutional challenges (e.g., the “skill vs. chance” debate) could reshape how the law is applied. Keeping close track of court rulings and authority guidelines will be crucial.
Regional strategy: Consider balancing India exposure with expansion into markets where licensing regimes are clearer (e.g., certain Asian, African, or European jurisdictions).
The Act envisages a national authority and follow-on rules to guide classification, oversight, and coordination with states. Esports and social/educational games are expected to see more policy support, but the market will remain cautious until there is clarity on enforcement timelines and the scope of permissible monetization.
Any platform offering real-money games—fantasy sports, rummy, poker, betting—falls within scope. Major brands have already suspended money-based play.
Yes. The law explicitly covers online money games whether skill-based, chance-based, or hybrid, if users stake money for a chance at monetary rewards.
The Centre will establish or designate an Online Gaming Authority to coordinate classification, enforcement, and directions to agencies and intermediaries, including potential blocking orders.
At Dot Connections, we track policy shifts and disruptive trends shaping the iGaming and online entertainment landscape worldwide. From compliance challenges to new market entries, our team delivers the intelligence operators and providers need to stay competitive.
🌍 If you’re planning to expand into dynamic markets in Asia, Africa, or Europe, our experts are ready to support your journey.
Follow Dot Connections for regulatory updates, market analysis, and strategic guidance on the future of iGaming.